fbpx

The grass IS greener for backgrounders

 

by Miranda Reiman

Cinch up that seatbelt. This cattle market madness is only going to get more dramatic.

You may think you’ve been on a rollercoaster ride, but Derrell Peel, Oklahoma State University (OSU) ag economist, shared data at a recent field day that could wow the most seasoned thrill seeker.

“We have record level prices pretty much anywhere you look in this industry and they’re going to get higher,” Peel said, addressing nearly 75 stocker operators earlier this month.

The “Backgrounding for Quality” seminar at White Brothers Cattle Co., near Chickasha, Okla., was co-sponsored by OSU, Pfizer Animal Health and Certified Angus Beef LLC (CAB).

Peel said being a market analyst used to be much easier. “Beef demand wasn’t changing much, international trade wasn’t all that important and corn was always $2 a bushel, so all you had to do was figure out the cattle inventory and you had a pretty good bet on what was going to happen in cattle markets.” 

Not anymore.

“What’s driving prices today is not something that’s happened overnight,” he said. The industry has liquidated cattle 14 of the last 16 years. In January, USDA numbers showed fewer than 91 million head of U.S. cattle, the lowest inventory since 1952.

That makes supply a key driver, not just in 2012, but for the next four to six years, he said.

Replacement heifer retention has increased since 2009. “But it hasn’t translated into net growth in the herd because we’ve had very large cow slaughter,” he said.

Drought drove that last year and still remains a wild card moving forward.

Perhaps surprisingly, these lower animal numbers have not shown up in the form of significantly smaller beef production, until now. (See chart.)

“You’re eating your way into smaller inventories,” Peel said, noting that liquidation means more harvested animals. “That supports production in the short run, but at some point you simply can’t maintain that. We have reached that point.”

Beef production was already declining during the last quarter of 2011, and the 2012 projection cuts that an additional 3% to 4%.

“We certainly have more concerns about what that’s going to do on the demand side,” he said, noting fears about how high prices can go before that turns away consumers.

“We’re at record-level prices and they’re only going to go higher,” Peel said. As heifers are retained, supplies will get tighter, putting a squeeze on through 2013 and maybe even 2014.

“That’s going to be very important from a beef demand standpoint in terms of how [consumers] will be able to respond with this additional pressure we’ll see on prices,” he said.

USDA Choice boxed beef has never traded above $2 per pound (lb.), but in recent months it’s gotten close (see chart). What’s a thorn to purchasers is a bright spot for any producers marketing on a value-based grid.

“For the last three years, we’ve had a pretty weak Choice-Select spread,” Peel said. “This year it’s returning to a bit more normal spread.”

Hamburger purchases are partially to blame, as consumers have shifted away from pricier steaks, or middle meats, to end meats.

“For the most part they didn’t stop eating beef,” he said.

Exports are picking up any slack, and setting records. Japan, Mexico, Canada and Korea are the major players, taking nearly equal shares of U.S. beef.

But even record prices can’t prop up profits when input prices are also on the same sky-high track.

“Most of the beef industry we know and think about was built on cheap feed, cheap corn,” Peel said. “We don’t have that right now.”

Or any time soon, he added, thanks to increased competition.

“The beauty of the market is that it never says you can’t have something. It just prices it so you can decide that you can get by without it,” he says.

That’s why the beef industry is better poised to deal with record-high corn prices.

“I don’t see a big future for stocker chickens,” he joked. “There are some folks promoting pasture poultry, and all that does is make the coyotes smile.”

For 40 years, the industry built up the idea of cheap gains on grain.

“Now it’s not the cheapest game in town so we need to think about how to do things differently,” Peel said. That, combined with high demand for forage, equals unparalleled opportunity for backgrounders.

“Pretty much anything you have to sell today sells pretty well,” he said. Marketing has gotten easier. Quality management is now the primary concern.

“You need to spend more of your attention than ever before on managing production,” he said. “Manage health, manage nutrition and manage cost to benefit from this market environment we’re in.”

You may also like

2022 Was as Predicted

2022 Was as Predicted

If there was a lesson in 2022, it was that the beef market is very sensitive to declines in quality grade, as evidenced through price signals. It’s the first time in recent history where we’ve gone backwards — albeit ever so slightly — and customers are telling us they have unfulfilled demand. That’s reflected in the premiums paid, and that’s saying something after two years of extremely high premiums.

The Cattle Market Teacher

The Cattle Market Teacher

Part intuition, part learned experience and a growing database gave Randy Blach the tools to communicate to producers what the market demands. The bottom line is consistently front and center, his mission is to keep more cattlemen and women on the land, doing what they do best.

Prime Grade Prompts Attention

Prime Grade Prompts Attention

Prime cutout values and grid premiums have been rich in the third and fourth quarters of the past two years. Yet the spillover into the first quarter this year shows that the market is reacting to the recently smaller availability, retreating back to the 2019 supply pace.

Responding to demand

 

by Steve Suther

Charting a course in the beef industry means acting on market signals and being ready for the reactions to those actions.

“The message of consumer demand is more complicated than it has ever been,” John Stika said at the Kansas State University Cattlemen’s Day earlier this month. Regardless of position in the beef industry, “we must interpret and respond by balancing those needs and expectations of consumers with our need to make a profit.”

The president of Certified Angus Beef LLC (CAB) said that response is critical at every step from the cow-calf to retail level. “Being the closest to the consumer, retailers are the first to detect these changing preferences,” he said.

Trend lines in 2011 clearly show a retail shift toward higher quality beef, with many of the largest companies making room for Choice product in their meat cases.

“Wal-Mart didn’t create a quality demand move,” Stika said. “They responded to it.” Consumers today consider a price-value relationship rather than price alone.

“We as an industry have experienced record sales of premium Choice beef during the worst economy in recent years,” he noted. “The only way to explain this is that folks were careful where their dollars were spent, and they didn’t gamble in the meat case.”

So consumers are willing to pay more for a product that they know is worth more (see chart), and they may be willing to pay still more.

“But there is an end out there somewhere,” Stika said. “For consumers to accept higher prices, we as producers must continue to increase quality.”

That way, retailers who have responded by offering more high-quality beef will be able to maintain that strategy and satisfy consumers who want their money’s worth.

The response must come from an entire industry that focuses on taste, the top reason consumers buy beef, said Stika, who admitted it seems a distant goal for many producers.

 “Eating satisfaction is a lower priority and a challenge to focus on,” he said. “That’s because there are so many other factors weighing into their decisions. But producers must hedge those factors against long-term beef demand.”

Stika acknowledged the real need for increasing efficiency amid high input costs, but progress there would ring hollow if the source of demand walks away. “We must always consider the wants and expectations of the consumer, who brings the only sustainable flow of dollars into our businesses.”

You may also like

2022 Was as Predicted

2022 Was as Predicted

If there was a lesson in 2022, it was that the beef market is very sensitive to declines in quality grade, as evidenced through price signals. It’s the first time in recent history where we’ve gone backwards — albeit ever so slightly — and customers are telling us they have unfulfilled demand. That’s reflected in the premiums paid, and that’s saying something after two years of extremely high premiums.

The Cattle Market Teacher

The Cattle Market Teacher

Part intuition, part learned experience and a growing database gave Randy Blach the tools to communicate to producers what the market demands. The bottom line is consistently front and center, his mission is to keep more cattlemen and women on the land, doing what they do best.

Prime Grade Prompts Attention

Prime Grade Prompts Attention

Prime cutout values and grid premiums have been rich in the third and fourth quarters of the past two years. Yet the spillover into the first quarter this year shows that the market is reacting to the recently smaller availability, retreating back to the 2019 supply pace.

Market-toppers need proof

Without a history, premiums paid don’t mean profit made

 

by Miranda Reiman

In most investment situations, you get a chance to evaluate the risk and rewards, do some research and make an informed decision. But when cattle pass through the sale barn in 30-second intervals, it’s not always easy for buyers to base decisions on anything more than appearance.

Data from Oklahoma-based Professional Cattle Consultants (PCC) shows that challenge could make the difference in whether feeders make or lose money on individual sets of cattle.

“You’d think premiums in the marketplace are being based on factors that will ultimately pay off when you’re going to sell those cattle,” says Dillon Feuz, ag economist with Utah State University.

This analysis, taken from five years of closeout data on millions of cattle from across the feeding belt, shows otherwise.

To get at the answers, actual purchase price was subtracted from the USDA Cash Feeder Price Index. All weights were standardized to a 750-pound (lb.) average using a 5 cent slide, and then sorted into four quartiles: heavy discount, light discount, light premium and heavy premium price.

The main finding? “Just because cattle look pretty doesn’t mean they are going to perform,” says Ron Hale, PCC analyst.

The top profit-getters were those with the heaviest discount, at -$20.90 per head, followed by those in the light discount (-$9.39) group. They earned $86.92 and $27.44 per head, respectively.

“If you pay a premium just because they look good or they have the hide color that you think is best, there’s enough variation in those groups that you’re going to come out short on those premiums,” Feuz says.

The PCC numbers illustrate that point. The quartile with a light “premium,” so slight the average came in barely negative at -$0.79, lost $17.15. The most expensive calves—purchased for $12.37-per-head above the market—lost $101.83 on feed.

Does this mean cattle are never worth a premium? Hardly; but it takes information to make them pay.

“If we could correctly identify the cattle that make the most money in the feedlot and grade the best, if we could identify those as feeders in the auction market,” Feuz says, “then the premiums aren’t big enough.”

The most expensive cattle in the analysis had the worst feed conversion at 6.56 lb. of feed/gain, compared to 6.38 lb. for the most efficient group. They ranked third for average daily gain.

Although grade wasn’t part of the dataset, previous PCC work pointed out a highly favorable correlation between gain and grade, so chances are those cattle with the highest premiums didn’t live up to quality expectations either.

Danny Herrmann, Ford County Feeders, says he’s willing to pay more for cattle that stay healthy, gain and convert, and grade. The best chance at those is recruiting repeat suppliers into his Kansas feedlot.

“If I have a pretty good history, I’ll try to buy those cattle again,” he says. In the long run, partnership pays off for ranchers, too. “Those people probably get more of a premium than the person who is just taking the highest price every year from a different person.”

Hale says producers who want to ensure cattle top the market year after year should make certain they deserve to.

“For a cow-calf man to do the best at marketing his cattle, he needs to know how his calves have performed and graded in the feedyard and how their health has been,” he says. “Then he can make changes and improve his cattle and develop a history.”

Communication is the key, says Herrmann—that and an extra dose of concern for the entire industry.

“If you do all the vaccinations and everything you can to give it 100%, I’ll be more interested,” he says. “But if you’re complaining about a 50-cent shot, then you’re telling me you don’t care about me. You need to be concerned about how the cattle perform for the next guy.”

Paying more for high-grading or source-and-age verified cattle, but selling them on the average live or dressed price is a flawed business model.

“If you’re paying a premium for cattle that you think are going to grade above average, but you’re not selling in a market that rewards that,” Feuz says, “then you’re just wasting money on a [calf] premium.”

At the ranch level, lack of knowledge on how cattle gain and grade after weaning makes it hard to know if its worth paying a premium for breeding stock, he adds.

Through the years, premium levels in the feeder-calf market have remained fairly consistent, but what they’re paid on has evolved.

“Feedlots are paying premiums based on perceived feedlot performance or end-carcass merit,” Feuz says. “What we’ve thought would deliver that over time has changed.”

Black-hided, Angus influence animals used to fetch a discount, for example.

“The biggest impact on feedlot profitability is how much you pay for those cattle,” Hale says. “There are times that discounts and premiums are worth it, but it all comes down to some kind of history.”

You may also like

Everything They Have

Everything They Have

Progress is a necessity on the Guide Rock, Nebraska, ranch where Troy Anderson manages a commercial Angus herd, small grower yard, his 10-year-old son, and a testing environment. Troy’s approach includes respect for his livestock, people and land. For that, Anderson Cattle was honored with the CAB 2023 Commercial Commitment to Excellence Award.

Showing Up, Every Day

Showing Up, Every Day

Thirty-five thousand cattle may fill these pens, but it’s the Gabel family who set the tone for each day. Steve and Audrey persistently create a people-first culture, echoed by their son Case and daughter Christie, who work alongside them in the yard office. The Gabel’s drive to effectively hit the high-quality beef target earned Magnum Feedyard the CAB 2023 Feedyard Commitment to Excellence award.

Making It Better

Making It Better

Most sane folks don’t choose to go into business with Mother Nature. She’s a fickle and unpredictable partner. So, how did two people with zero agricultural background, no generational land, wealth or genetics carve a profitable partnership with her in Southwest Kansas? By focusing on progress and a desire to leave things better than they found them – which also earned them the CAB Sustainability Award.

Quality, price higher for beef in 2010

January 28, 2011

The 2010 beef business trends include exceptional prices, increased quality and better rewards.

“Slaughter cows and bulls were a hot commodity and producers cashed in on those record prices from the spring through the fall,” said Paul Dykstra, beef cattle specialist with the Certified Angus Beef ® (CAB®) brand. He tracks USDA grading trends and harvest numbers in his weekly column, Rearview Mirror on Quality.

Reviewing last year’s data, Dykstra noted fed steers averaged almost $12/hundredweight (cwt.) more in 2010 than in 2009, according to the USDA 5-Area Report ($94.89 vs. $83.16). However, that just marked a return to 2008 levels.

“They were a highlight only with regard to timing and the state of the nation’s economy,” Dykstra said. “The elusive $100 target was captured or surpassed one week in October and four out of the last five weeks of the year. Still, the beef market was resilient, to say the least, during a very tough time.”

Strong exports and improved hide and offal values have been credited for some of the bounce-back.

“Corn and other grains faired just as well, so we can’t discount what drove breakevens to new heights,” Dykstra added.

Higher cattle prices did not subdue the packers’ rate of harvest. Federally inspected harvest numbers were up 2.81% year over year. That’s 17,812 head per week, roughly equivalent to the output of one additional medium to large size packing plant—but that is not what happened.

“There were no major facilities added to production,” Dykstra said. “Packers simply kept their chains working more hours and kept the schedules full. But carcass weights were down.”

Steer carcasses averaged 835 pounds (lb.), down 12 lb. from 2009, while heifers were 14 lb. lighter at 768 lb. each. 

“Early predications say carcasses will get bigger in 2011 to compensate for fewer available calves and fed cattle,” he noted. “As the world’s foremost producer of corn-fed beef, the quality of the U.S. product is top-of-mind to everyone with a stake in the game.”

From 2000 to 2007, the number of carcasses grading USDA Choice increased only 0.05 percentage points, but 2008 and 2009 brought two years of heavy increases. The Choice share of the annual harvest moved up by 3.37 and then 3.51 percentage points, respectively.

“Stakeholders questioned if this rapid advance would hold or if short-term factors had created the two-year anomaly in grading,” the CAB cattle specialist said. “Extreme winter weather covered the feeding belt in 2009 and the onset of heavy inclusion of distiller’s by-products in feedlot rations coincided with the timeline, as did full adoption of camera-assisted grading by USDA.”

Dykstra said, “2010 may have settled some of the doubts.”

The Choice grade moved higher again, though not as dramatically, by 1.53 percentage points to end the year at 61.4% for all USDA-graded plants. The Prime grade increased a modest 0.17 percentage point, to bring the annual average to 3.15% of last year’s annual fed cattle harvest.

“That small fraction is of little consequence to the commodity masses, but it carves out an advantage for breeders and feeders who care to focus on it,” he said. “Scarcity means higher values.”

USDA grid pricing numbers indicate that an 850-lb. Prime carcass would’ve brought $132.86 above regional fed-cattle averages in 2010, $167.62 higher than a Select carcass of the same weight.         

The portion of black cattle, eligible for branded beef programs based on the “Angus type” requirement, was higher again in 2010. 

“Data tracking came to a halt in late October, due to USDA system overhauls, but the nine-month trend showed the black-hided share of fed cattle at 63.68%,” Dykstra said.            

That’s up 2.34 points from 2009, when USDA first began reporting it. With the combination of more black-hided cattle in the harvest mix and a higher grading trend, USDA shows 25.4% of the Choice-grading carcasses were certified into an upper-two-thirds-Choice branded program like CAB in 2010. That’s an annual increase of 2.24 points.

Price per pound still commands attention when cattlemen decide production goals and management plans. 

“Choice and premium Choice beef supplies are at record levels, so we’d expect price per pound to decrease for these two classes on a year-to-year basis, but the opposite is true,” Dykstra said.

Weekly USDA grid price data says packers paid an average of $6.30/cwt. for Choice above Select in 2010, up $1.20/cwt. of carcass compared to 2009. The CAB premium—added to the Choice bonus for qualifying carcasses—also increased. Although individual grids paid significantly more, the weighted U.S. average moved up from $2.71 to $2.78/cwt. At the same time, Yield Grade (YG) 1 carcasses (those with the least external fat) improved 4 cents while YG 4 carcasses were devalued by 3 cents to a discount of -$3.83/cwt. 

“The premium for marbling is much lower than it was in 2006, when we had 10% fewer Choice carcasses and the U.S. economy was roaring,” Dykstra allowed. “But, given the uncertainty in our domestic market and the increased availability of Choice and higher beef, the uptick in premiums flew in the face of expectations. The nod goes to quality, where American cattlemen are leading the world.”

You may also like

Quality Wins, Again

Quality Wins, Again

Sara Scott, Vice President of Foodservice for Certified Angus Beef, emphasizes the importance of taste over price in the beef market during the Feeding Quality Forum. As consumer demand for high-quality beef grows, Scott highlights the need for increased supply and encourages communication with packer partners to meet the demand for Prime beef.