Where back fat, marbling and money meet
There are fat cattle, and then there are fat cattle
by Steve Suther
It’s a wonder any cattle feeder can judge the marbling inside the ribeye by guessing fat thickness just under the hide. It shouldn’t work, but grid marketing of finished cattle is largely based on this acquired skill.
Robert Maddock, meat scientist at North Dakota State University, recently authored a white paper, “The relationship between subcutaneous fat and marbling,” to help sort out the finer points.
On a carcass, the “sub-Q” is referred to as external fat, but most producers just call it back fat. Marbling is a more common term for intramuscular fat, the white flecks within meat that carry much of the flavor and determine taste.
It’s a key issue in cattle feeding Maddock says, because putting on too much back fat means “lower carcass yields and higher costs of gain, whereas lack of marbling results in lower carcass value and generally lower consumer eating satisfaction.”
The crux of the matter is these two manifestations of fat are only moderately related at best. Estimating fat cover is “not a good method of evaluating the marbling potential of finished cattle.”
Still, it is possible to manage both or even enhance marbling while keeping back fat in check.
Historically, USDA quality grades declined for 16 years from 1990 to 2006 and the incidence of over-finished, yield grade (YG) 4 cattle increased for the last half of that period. Since 2006, both quality and yield grades have improved.
Only a tiny fraction of Prime carcasses were YG 1 in the 2011 National Beef Quality Audit, the same tiny fraction of Standard (no roll) carcasses that were YG 5. Most Prime and top Choice carcasses were YG 3.
Marbling growth is linear (see line graph) and “occurs at a relatively constant rate throughout finishing,” the paper notes. “The high caloric intake of cattle in the feedlot allows the body to deposit marbling at the same time as it deposits subcutaneous fat.”
That can start before cattle enter the feedlot, however, and the white paper points out:
• As long as the caloric and nutritional needs of growing cattle are met, energy in excess of requirements for growth will result in marbling development no matter the age of the cattle.
• When calories in excess of growth requirements are available, marbling will develop to the genetic potential of the cattle.
At some point, back fat and yield grade begin to increase faster than marbling growth. Data from the American Angus Association (see table) shows the greatest marbling growth occurs while 12th-rib fat is increasing from 0.3 to 0.5 inches, with little added marbling after 0.6 inches.
Tying in economic concerns, Maddock concludes, “Cattle should be fed until a point where excessive external fat and carcass weight result in discounts greater than any premium that can be obtained from higher marbling scores.”
The details are in that white paper at http://www.cabpartners.com/news/research.php
You may also like
Sustainability is a new target for producers. While there are no plans to meet these goals yet, there is interest in how cattle can be part of the solution. It comes down to the adage, “trust but verify,” and verification will need to come from those raising beef.
Sustainability is an all-encompassing term for social, environmental and economic business needs. The popular, updated term describes many of the same best practices cattlemen have put to work for generations.
Prime cutout values and grid premiums have been rich in the third and fourth quarters of the past two years. Yet the spillover into the first quarter this year shows that the market is reacting to the recently smaller availability, retreating back to the 2019 supply pace.